Who Was Amy Eskridge?
And what happened to her?
Have you heard of Amy Eskridge?
Because I know you guys love the weird shit, otherwise — lesbihonest — you wouldn’t be here. Well, with UAP re-entering the zeitgeist, and now electrogravitic propulsion systems entering the Overton Window, I thought it was a good moment to highlight a very important dynamic to these topics. There is a lot of weirdness that comes with gravitical physics — something that is most certainly not widely known by the NPCs and normies.
This is why I want to have a conversation about Amy Eskridge. Our girl, may she rest in peace, was at a powerful nexus point of controversial topics: captured academia, UFOs/UAPs, fringe physics, black budget research, and DoD funding (untraceable funds more like).
Amy Catherine Eskridge died June 11th, 2022. She was Chairwoman and President of The Institute for Exotic Science. Amy graduated from University of Alabama with a double major in chemistry and biology with a reputation for multidimensional expertise in: electrical engineering, chemistry, physics, genetic engineering, and nanotechnology. Amy’s friend, Sam Reid (CEO of Geometric Energy Corporation) named one of the company’s Earth Orbit satellites and their “DOGE-1” payload (curious naming), that was destined for the moon, after her.
Her dad, Richard H. Eskridge, was a propulsion researcher at NASA’s George C. Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama. Remember Huntsville, the two never left. And will be brought up in the video clip shortly.
This story is very dense, so I’m going to practice KISS and simply provide topics, information, and sources from here. No need for pretty words.
The Institute for Exotic Science
In 2018, Amy co-founded the Institute for Exotic Science in Huntsville, Alabama, serving as its President and Chairwoman. This public benefit corporation focused on cutting-edge technologies, including propulsion, quantum gravity, and material science. The institute aimed to create a collaborative environment for scientists and engineers to explore revolutionary concepts in these fields.
HAL5 2018 Presentation
On December 6, 2018, Amy delivered a presentation titled "A Historical Perspective on Anti-Gravity Technology" at the Huntsville Alabama L5 Society (HAL5). In her talk, she reviewed the timeline of anti-gravity research, discussing devices from Brown's Gravitator in the 1920s to the modern EM Drive. She also highlighted the challenges and controversies associated with anti-gravity research, emphasizing the need for independently funded studies to advance the field.
2018 HAL5 Presentation Audience Q&A portion:
Audience: (55:28) "You talked about funding, and uh, that seems to be the common denominator in all this stuff. Funding or lack of. Who is... where is there any money that you know of? Are you aware of any private money that's being spent on this? Is anyone talking to angel investors, or, that sort of stuff?"
Amy: (55:50) "Let me give you the down-low on the money situation. So, you've got your black budgets. That obviously is well funded. And then you've got your academic budget which is non-existent because they think it's hokey. And then you have your random billionaires, who have a hobby, and they made their money doing something else. But they're applying their money towards weird anti-gravity stuff because they want to be known for something other than what they made their money in. So there's several, there's a handful of random billionaires running around, who fund these types of things. The Churches Chicken Fried billionaire funded the Hathaway Lab. The American Best Inn and Suites billionaire, Robert Bigelow, of course is Bigelow Aerospace. There are some others that I know of."
Amy: (56:42) "But, we're really trying to address that problem with The Institute that we're doing, because I've seen government research, I've seen academic research, I've seen private research, and money is always the problem. The technology is never the problem. The technology is there. And the talent is there. So what we've done with the institute is we've sort of assembled some of these random people, with big budgets and a hobby, and we've said 'hey can we pool money into a big stable pot of money' so that we can have a safe well-funded sandbox for smart people to play in, and not have to worry about government election cycles affecting their budget, or tenure effecting their budget, or even when you find your billionaire sometimes the billionaire runs out of money, or loses interest, or disappears. So you can't just be dependent on one wealthy investor. You need a big pot of money that's stable, that isn't going anywhere. So that's what we're trying to do with the institute. Just fund the institute. And then pick projects that we think are promising, and then fund those. So we're kind of creating a new vehicle for funding this type of research. That's the approach I'm taking right now?"
Audience: (58:08) "Is there any possibility of... I know this is probably hard, if not impossible to do... but cross-over between black-world and the illuminated world? Because frequently things move from the illuminated world into the black-world. And they disappear."
Amy: (58:26) "Yeah. We've noticed that."
Audience: (58:30) "But, I mean it's to the black-worlds advantage to keep the illuminated world going, because, that acts as a spawning ground for ideas that they might not have. The black world. So, it's not necessarily to their advantage to keep it completely stagnated. And potentially, since Griffin is now at the pinnacle of the group that controls DARPA, and he has a history that goes through UAH, there would seem to be possibly some fertile ground for some conversation..."
Amy: (59:16) "Yeah, um, I've thought about that. The combination of the private and the public-private institution, and working with the 'blacker budget.'"
Audience: (59:31) "A quote from Griffin. 'NASA is no longer, by any means, a research organization.'"
Amy: (59:39) "That is a Griffin quote."
Audience: (59:41) "Yeah, that is a Griffin quote."
Amy: (59:45) "Yeah, I imagine there are some string opinions about Griffin in the room."
Stuff gets awkward in the audience at this point, and Amy moves onto talking about corporate structure and why it's structured the way it is.
Audience: (01:04:28) "SO WHAT ABOUT THE INNOVATOR WHO IS AFRAID OF DISAPPEARING?"
Amy: (01:04:31) "Well, that's a whole 'nother problem. *audience laughs* I think doing it in the public is better in that case. That's a different..."
Audience: (01:04:44) "That doesn't mean you won't disappear. Even if you do it in the public, that still don't mean the inventor won't disappear for lots of reasons."
Audience: (01:04:55) "Like Ning Li!"
— There is much, much more to read. Use the URL below. —
Source: https://archive.is/2023.08.02-221219/https://pad.riseup.net/p/KPy5hBybGiN6Qek1liNF#selection-525.0-685.36
Work with NASA
Amy's father, Richard H. Eskridge, was a retired NASA engineer and scientist. Together, they co-founded HoloChron Engineering, a company specializing in gravity modification research and development. While specific details of Amy's direct collaborations with NASA are limited, her family's connection to the agency and her involvement in advanced propulsion research suggest a close association.
Nanotechnology
Amy's academic background included significant work in nanotechnology. She conducted research in Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS), focusing on testing piezoelectric microcantilevers and gyroscopes. Additionally, she worked on non-viral polymeric drug delivery formulations and gene therapy research, demonstrating her versatility across multiple scientific disciplines.
Strange Circumstances
In an interview on August 25, 2024, former UK counter-intelligence officer Franc Milburn discussed his investigation into Amy's death. He mentioned that her passing had been labeled a suicide but expressed skepticism about this conclusion, citing a lack of thorough investigation and the swift cremation of her body. Milburn also noted that Amy had been a victim of surveillance and harassment prior to her death, which he believed could be connected to her work in anti-gravity research.
Franc Mullner, who seems to have had an intimate friendship or some form of relationship with Ms. Eskridge. Whatever it is, he joined the Coast To Coast AM show to discuss what he knew about… “interesting” events that she, and those close to her, experienced.
Our boy Ashton Forbes finds relying on his work and work ethic, yet again, here.
So, what do you think? I can tell you what I think. But I won’t.
Who was Amy Eskridge?
Who was Ning Li?
How is it that these two women wind up dead, working in the same field?
Why do so many scientists in this area of research and physics wind up disappeared or dead?
Thanks for reading guys, really. This is simply a passion of mine that I am doing in my free-time working a normal job like the rest of you.
Every Like, Share, and Comment is appreciated.
Subscribe to let me know you want more of this kind of stuff!